Refuting DeepLeftAnalysis on Replacement Immigration
Against the Retard Legions of DeepLeftAnalysis
It’s not every day that a social media rant turns into a stand-alone article, despite me typing essays at clouds or into tiny obscure forums just about every day.
This time though I got into a bit of a back-and-forth with DeepLeftAnalysis about the fundamentals of IQ and multi-racial immigration. DLA is presumably Leftist, but how deeply so remains a mystery…
He spends a fair amount of time writing articles about lefty-righty topics, including oppositions to Nationalism, which is probably how he ends up in my Substack feed. I swear if you pause for just 2 seconds over some boobie note or tittering banality, suddenly that’s all you get ever after in the Substack feed!
Anyway, DLA’s notes range more broadly. Those that aren’t him rapping or playing out some kind of roleplay with himself sometimes catch my eye, and their often smarmy overtones compel me to respond – tersely and otherwise. This comment prodded me in particular:
“If you really believed in the power of IQ, then you would realize that the chance of a single 130 IQ immigrant is worth many multiples of 70 IQ immigrants. IQ is that important that a single genius can outweigh a legion of imbeciles.” -DLA, Oct 11th, 2025
The DLA claim is that the opportunity of bringing in even a single racially-foreign bigwit justifies bringing in hordes of his dimwitted racial countrymen. Quantitatively, of course, though in our exchange he didn’t share his negronometry with the rest of the class.
It didn’t seem to occur to DLA to fathom some kind of system that could test for IQ and other pertinent metrics as part of immigration qualification. Those darkies apparently are absolutely impossible for this aspiring phrenologist to distinguish by any means!
Likewise he seems to believe without such immigration our supply of bigwits will just run out inexplicably, like our supply of tacos should we ever deport all the Mexicans. As we all know, our fair gringo hands are genetically incapable of folding pieces of flatbread. No matter how we try, they just turn into hamburgers or pizzas. Such is the White Man’s curse.
Well naturally Norm took exception to this hairy gobstopper of a canard, and immediately proposed a counter-thesis:
In short, my thesis is that the damage caused to a country by not just technical-retards but racially foreign incompatibles at that far outweighs whatever potential benefits derived from obtaining rare high-IQ individuals from those groups.
My astute audience can surely think of quite a few ways imbecilic racial foreigners trash whatever country they are imported into, but I must elaborate. This arrogant and misguided sentiment - that dumb non-Whites are harmless and just waiting for their infusion of magic soil and FREEDOM™ to turn them into doctors and engineers - is as pervasive as it is pernicious.
After a few rounds of discourse, DLA surprisingly asked if we could articles out of this topic. Fine, if it takes someone annoying me with horrible takes to coax me into actually doing something on Substack like a proper writer, so be it.
Not knowing what his particular quantitative analysis will be beforehand given his reticence to share in our exchange, I nevertheless typed this piece. Also par for the course for make slowpoke ways, he finished his article before I got done slugging my way through mine. But I won’t take advantage of his promptness by altering my own course. He wasn’t privy to my arguments either in writing his, so it wouldn’t be sporting to snipe out his specific arguments.
I’ll just carpet-bomb the whole field of this discussion instead!
My strategy in beating this dead horse of a topic? Surgically pummel the damn equine from every direction until I can sign-tap on its flattened corpse for all future instances I encounter of this suicidal perception. Sprinkle in some spicy statistics amid just common sense, and that should more than cover the many fallacies and psychological manipulations we tend to come up against on this topic.
So lets not keep DLA or his broccoli-perm waiting any longer, shall we?
Great Innovator Argument
Lets start with the “Great Innovator” angle, which goes something like this:
“If we don’t let racial foreigners in, then we might miss out on having the next world-changing genius as our own!”
Foremost to recognize in this argument is that it blatantly exploits FOMO – Fear Of Missing Out. You know that highly addictive emotional trigger that every social media company uses to draw you back into updoot loops? The same emotional manipulation that hopeless gambling addicts cite whenever it is suggested they stop with such a destructive habit?
There’s an additional hidden notion with this argument that if America doesn’t directly house such a world-changing genius personally, somehow the great innovation will either never come or be used against us.
No wonder this argument is so pervasive with such a gambler’s hook to it. You better pull that lever no matter how many whammy’s you get, or you’ll definitely miss out on the jackpot! But like most manipulations, it won’t stand up to objective analysis.
To begin, most of the world’s greatest innovations – computers, internal combustion engines, electrical harnessing, hamburgers, etc – were developed by Europeans and European-derived stock. Though it is only a proxy measure, the list of countries of origin for Nobel Prize winners throughout the years is absolutely dominated by America and Europe, with the notable addition of Japan.
This is not because of IQ alone, by the way. Japan have the highest reliably measured average IQ on the planet with a median value of 103-105. Yet they don’t lead the rankings in paradigm-changing inventions. Why? Because IQ alone isn’t exactly what creates groundbreaking shifts in technology. A certain adventurous sense and creative risk-taking combined with that strong intellect and independent agency tend to produce more innovations (and failures) than otherwise. And that confluence of traits just happen to be quite common among Northern and Western European peoples.
Conversely, the number of significant inventions in the past 200 years from South Americans, Africans, and virtually all the other non-White, non-East Asian peoples could probably fit onto a single notecard. Wait, what’s that I hear whispering on the wind? Is that… peanut butter?
Whenever general Black intellectual or creative tendency is challenged, the fact that the first thing brought up in defense is almost always the supposed invention of peanut butter testifies to how inventively destitute those peoples are. In 400 years of existence in America, is a snack the best they can do? By the way, George Washington Carver didn’t “invent” peanut butter, he modified one of its existing processing practices – modifications, not new paradigms.
When it comes to gambling, which this entire argument is predicated on, one has to appreciate the odds of a bet paying off. The fact is one will have many multiple times as much luck finding world-class geniuses among the Swiss, British, Germans, and French than whatever you will find among Somalians, Haitians, Mexicans, and the rest of the 3rd World. If you’re to play the slots and one machine not only has a bigger payout but better odds too, why would you ever play other machines?
Furthermore, just because a thing is rare does not mean it is worthwhile. That rare high-IQ Liberian is most often just a middling intellect compared to those of our own population. Being able to occupy a minor bureaucratic post in America is nothing to write home about, but in a failed state like Liberia such a man could be a high-ranking official guiding the destiny of his people. We’ve already got too many meager bureaucrats, we don’t need even more from foreign lands dictating how we live.
To propose bringing in legions of this middling star’s literally retarded countrymen is like placing a thousand losing bets just to win one small payout. You’ll quickly go bankrupt with such a foolish strategy.
Real investments are not based on gambling. Go with the good bets, or stop betting at all.
Cultivation Argument
Oh but the Multi-Culties don’t stop with just one bad argument – oh no! The White Man’s Burden is a nasty gobstopper of an ideology, one that has layer upon layer of calcified, delusional crust to break through to get to its foolhardy core.
When the previous argument fails, adherents often move onto the next: Cultivation.
“Those 3rd world countries are truly bad, yes, but that’s all the more reason to bring them here to a good country where genius can flourish!”
Ah yes, the nerdery. The place we cloister all our eggheads together so they can be carefully tended and crafted into highly productive members of our civilization. The outside world might crack those delicate noggins and stuff those shattered nerds into lockers for being so threateningly smert.
We called them colleges once, you know. Very useful institutions before Leftist infestation, but the truth is that the whole of our societies are incubation chambers for our particular forms of genius. Our civic environment has to be finely maintained to achieve optimal results. Like with actual incubators where any variance in temperature, humidity, jostling, or air quality can easily ruin the potential of incubated eggs, the various civic conditions of our societies so influence our delicate eggheads. For nerds to thrive, we need certain cultural mores, general predictability, overall safety, high opportunity, economic sufficiency, and high trust to make an environment high IQ’s tend to thrive in.
Yet this line of reasoning that our incubators can cultivate anyone regardless of their background or qualities is, again, an extension of the fantastical Magic Dirt Hypothesis: By mere exposure to our way of life, these strange and moronic savages will transform into Whites just like us - save for irrelevant outward “aesthetics”.
It is an absurd and fundamentally disrespectful way of viewing non-Whites, like they are some kind of wholly plastic, non-agentic substance shaped wholly by their environment without any inner-guidance whatsoever. It is difficult for me to even fathom how so many Whites continue to believe it. They believe shithole environments wholly turned them into shithole-people, so by simply changing the environment you will change the people.
As if you could change sewage water into fine wine by pouring that filth into the cask.
The obvious reality is that those countries are shitholes because the people who built them are themselves shitty. Barring examples like warfare, famine, and other temporary disasters, a country comes to resemble the people who inhabit it no differently than a coral reef comes to resemble the species of coral that comprise it.
Haiti is a sterling example of what incompatible racial succession looks like. Within the shell of what was once called the Jewel of the Caribbean, the Haitian Negroes eradicated the French colonists and came to dwell in the thriving society that the Frenchmen built. Now a few hundred years later, Haiti is a horrifying failed state teeming with mud cookies and cannibals, and its French ruins rot from the inherent neglect of a people who could never build anything near as complex or beautiful as it.
The same applies to South Africa, a European colony once so advanced their farming fed half of Africa and their doctors pioneered open heart surgery. Now after racial invasion, the remaining Boers are hunted in their homes by roving privateers. The government can’t even keep the lights on consistently because Negroes can’t be bothered to maintain their pillaged infrastructure. The Zulu can no more maintain a Dutch civilization than a fly can maintain a spider’s web.
All can agree that a shithole country is not conducive for higher-order thinking. When you have to spend your time scavenging for mud cookies and fending off cannibalistic bandits, it doesn’t afford you much energy to focus on solving higher civilizational quandaries. You’re stuck in tribal conflict and survival mode. What adherents of the cultivation argument ignore is that people, not magic soil or economics, make countries. And shitty people make shitty countries as surely as brilliant people make brilliant countries.
This returns us to the nerdery. Genius is a delicate form of intellect that needs sequestering from even a normal high-grade society in order to bring out its greatest potential. Real geniuses are essentially savants with (slightly) less brain damage, and tend to be prickly, grouchy, and socially weird. It is said that with one standard deviation difference of IQ between people, communication becomes strained - but by two standard deviations difference the parties become nearly incomprehensible to each other. All the dimwit hears when a bigwit speaks is some kind of possessed creature casting spells over him, and the midwit’s speech is but a desperate begging to be stuffed into a locker.
If you want to maximize the odds of extracting value from that 130 IQ guy, you need to severely limit the number of 70 IQ troglodytes roaming around their territory. The inherent retardation and cultural confusion caused by these dimwits will act like wrenches in the gears of bigwit incubation chambers, distracting and even harming them as they get attacked for gibs, run over in the streets, or otherwise harassed by jenkum huffing morons.
Yet DLA would usher them all in, retards and all - for what? For the mere chance that one of those gutter-oil salesmen or jungle cannibals would be a high-IQ sort. A genius who simply cannot express their brilliance fully because they’re surrounded by the shitty people of their shithole country.
So DLA’s solution is to invite in the very people who made their homeland shitty, or let them do it themselves, because somehow that is part and parcel with obtaining genius. That is suicidally absurd, and would be funny if it wasn’t routinely done throughout the West today.
Invite the 3rd world, become the 3rd world.
Contribution Argument
“But they deserve to be here, because they will contribute to our society!”
Oh boy, what a black box of a word “contribute” is. Perfectly vague yet unquestionably positive, a word that one can pull anything they wish out of it and call it a profound, unique, and irreplaceable gift. It’s called a Glittering Generality, and upon the sturdy back of this psychological manipulation is built an entire subclass of excuses for opening our gates to the largely worthless, if not actively harmful, dregs of the world.
The assumption Universalist Whites often make is that everyone pays the same into society as they do. Anyone who doesn’t is simply temporarily embarrassed due to misfortune. With just a little encouragement, and maybe some generous welfare, they will get back to paying into the common coffers just like the rest of us.
Maybe sprinkling some of that magic dirt over their heads and clapping for their every fart and burp will make the spell work even better! Why not? It’s no less fanciful as the rest of the proposition.
The reality is that only Whites and some East-Asians tend to contribute positively and significantly to European society. Lifetime welfare serves as a decent proxy for measuring that vague “contribution” word, since those who over their lifetimes seed more into that system are providing a measurable positive overall impact, while leeches don’t.
There are many hidden costs strewn about introducing incongruent racial types into a civilization. You need only sample the colorful jokes people have for other groups to get the often-true stereotypes that grind their gears. But while culture, behavior, and essence are difficult to quantify, we can still look to quantifiable metrics like civility and finances to objectively compare these costs. When it comes to Hispanics and Blacks, violent crimes and heavy welfare negate whatever meager contributions they make otherwise.
These peoples in the aggregate are financial, civic, and social burdens in White society, the very antithesis of “contributing”. Yet so many sheltered and pampered Liberals argue to endure all of that because Pedro makes a tasty street taco and talks funny.
They don’t have to live next to Pedro and his kin’s ever-expanding favelas or be kept up at night to obnoxious mariachi music and gunfire. Oh they’ll take the cocaine for their parties and the tacos for their lunch, and just ignore the coyote rape, the gangland savagery, and the economic slavery that invariably comes along with these sorts. Don’t worry, our selfish bourgeois can afford to ignore it – they don’t have to let sombrero-wearers inside their gated community, after all.
But yours? Yours is different, White man.
They certainly don’t care that their policies force Pedro and company onto their less fortunate countrymen, because they nurse their known hatreds towards Cleetus and Clyde while knowing nothing about Pedro except his tacos and silly hats. And the more the affected complain about the horrendous drop of life quality, the more these bourgeois can morally justify their racial imposition as a punishment against “Nazis”.
These people have the absolute privilege to engage in Prestige Moralizing – Virtue Signaling – where they can support insane and suicidal moral policies that showcase how magnanimous and selfless and all-compassionate they are to their wine-sipping coterie while ignoring the real human costs. It’s human peacocking, a sort of social one-upsmanship characteristic of decadent White civilization.
Prestige Morality is the White man’s version of Indian Train-Baiting, with even worse results.
If the term “contributing” is to mean anything, it must have a certain standard. Lets make the small assumption that our Western civilization’s native national type – Whites of various sub-specie flavors – are in the aggregate contributing at a baseline sufficient level to their society. After all, our ancestors built these wonderful civilizations, suggesting the net “contribution” when just limited to our heritage population is sufficient under general circumstances to maintain and advance our civilization.
Lets then use the absolutely quantifiable proxy measure of aggregate financial impact on a Western civilization as our metric. Like IQ it is a major, though not most important, metric by which a whole host of societal interests can be accurately predicted and analyzed.
Then, all we have to do is compare the aggregates of various racial and national types against this baseline to see how much “contribution” there tends to be from these populations. A simple, elegant, and reasonable methodology, really. So of course the Internet anons and the Dutch already did that:
To summarize, the only migrants that positively contribute over their lifetimes to the Netherlands financially without significantly backsliding into leechery in the second generation are Canadians/Americans, most Europeans, the Japanese and some Asiatics, and Israelis. The rest leech immediately and eternally.
This kind of analysis can and has been done in multiple countries where it is not yet illegal or verboten to explore the truth about racial differences. This also disproves the overwhelming value of whatever 130 IQ types are contributing from most non-White populations, because however many are being brought in, their group’s aggregate score still remains in the gutter.
Again, finances are not the only nor most important metric to measure the success of a civilization or how compatible peoples are with it. The Chinese form enclave Chinatowns where they feed constant spy data back to the mother hive. Indians exploit H1B systems to usurp American corporations and industries. Jews manipulate financial, cultural, and political spheres to cheat their way into power and institute policies like infinite immigration that harm all groups. This severely weighs against whatever tax revenue these groups tend to contribute.
Fundamentally, racial foreigners do not value our people or way of life like our own do. This is normal and practically inevitable with everyone save for those so similar in culture, history, and biology as to be compatible with one another. Therefore they often introduce the dollops of dookie into the ice cream of our society in many forms beyond easily quantifiable metrics. These more important things are qualitative in nature and difficult to compare on a spreadsheet, but matter more than any IQ or tax revenue.
Nevertheless, bald-faced financial leechery in general indicates if nothing else a basic burden – not a contribution – to the system that accepts them. Whatever non-quantifiable thing they “contribute” would have to be rather astounding to make up for those incredible shortfalls – and the burden of showing that lies on DLA’s and other multicultural advocate shoulders.
How many street tacos does it take to balance out the bad of a collapsed state?
Need Argument
“You don’t understand, we need immigrants or we are going to collapse as a society!”
Another facet of the FOMO fear-mongering is outright claiming doom and gloom if we would dare close the floodgates to the world’s lusting hordes. How will we ever replace our declining population? How will be fight brain drain? What about the rest of the world outpacing our precious GDP!? Won’t you just please think of the strawberries!?!
This form of claptrap is simply the negative form of the same gambler instinct, trying to frighten overly comfortable Americans into fearing that if they don’t employ slaves they will run out of toilet paper or strawberries – you know, the worst possible thing an average American can imagine happening to them in daily life.
History has proven time and again in everything, from war to business to culture and beyond, that the quality of a nation’s members matters more than their absolute quantity – a fact more pertinent today in a world of celebrity and hyper-efficiencies than it ever was in the ancient world.
The tiny kernel of truth of DLA’s sentiment about solitary geniuses is that the contributions of a singular man can outweigh those of the multitude, granted he be well-positioned and supported by his circumstances. But what DLA fails to comprehend is that those circumstances most often include being in the midst of a coherent society of familiars that insulate and uphold him against that which would work against his genius - and not be lost amid discordant troglodytes requiring constant nannying to keep from gobbling up your pets and stabbing you for pocket change.
We do not need infinitely-growing populations. No system predicated on infinite growth can sustainably persist forever, nor without dire consequences for the foundations of what makes society operate. It is only a model based on chronic inflation and the devaluing of labor and human life in general that requires infinite population growth. The pushers of such a system ironically fail to realize such a model requires that growth be of quality contributors and not obligate leeches to not collapse entirely.
Brain-drain is a result of a lack of opportunities and a lower quality of life in the affected areas, and we run a greater risk of experiencing it in areas afflicted by DLA’s legion of retards. The whining argument that might arise from that, to say we can only source high IQ to any significant degree from outside our population, is wildly incorrect on the face of it – and particularly so when examining non-White, non-East Asian nations.
Population IQ follows a fairly predictable Gaussian (or Normal) Curve, so predictable in fact that we know with fairly high precision that the number of individuals with 130 or higher IQ in a population whose median IQ is 100 and standard deviation is 15 points is going to be roughly 2.2% of that population. For heritage Americans, this makes for 4-5 million among us to draw from a population of 200 – 250 million Whites.
That is more brainpower available to us in a single country than most of the Western world, even when most of it is squandered by inefficiencies and corruptions aimed against Whites. Our brainpower is not lacking, it is underutilized. And it is underutilized in great part due to a system that looks outside of its borders to bring in cheap foreign labor to do work that once was done by our people.
Case in point, machinists in America are a dying breed. Where once this was the country that invented the motorcar and airplanes, our machining industry has been systematically sold for scraps to China, India, and other foreign countries. It is so bad that we even send our patents and proprietary machines overseas just so their sweatshops can increase stockholder margins.
Decades of this behavior has led to a massive decay in living knowledge of tooling trades within our nation. Now it is to the point that many industries are so bereft of existing talent that they seek talent externally rather than training up a new generation internally – perpetuating the problem!
H1B’s likewise have long been exploited by Indians to overtake American companies. There is no magic to it, just gaming an overly trusting system and engaging in the ancient tried-and-true practice of racial nepotism and perfidious sabotage. By systematically filling key hiring and executive positions with their countrymen, Indians have overtaken hospitality, logistics, and tech industries not through merit but sheer manipulation and persistence. The results are profoundly Indian in nature…
Arabs simply employ an enclave strategy to seize political and social power by sheer numbers. Once their numbers hit certain critical percentages of the population, their political strategy shifts into more demands, more agitation, and more steps towards the institution of Sharia Law and Islamic practices. A conquest by any means is still a conquest, and the chart below provides an excellent case of the stages of this conquest that sadly can be watched in real-time all across Europe:
The worst part is that it is not just the legions of retards who are creating these problems, but often enough the very bigwits DLA seeks to bring in at all costs. A historical example being the Walt Disney company. Despite Disney himself being rather suspicious of and even antagonistic towards Jews, his company still employed several based on their personal merit, by which they often legitimately (more or less) climbed the corporate ladder.
However, shortly after his death, Disney fell squarely into the hands of Jewish interests, who immediately set about inviting in all of their cousins, children, and synagogue acquaintances. Skill didn’t matter, only their Jewishness. The number of Jews imported into the operating structures of the company increased through the years until now it falls squarely into the ranks of Jewish-controlled media companies. This nepotistic pattern is repeated for virtually all non-White racial groups, because it is incredibly effective and nets the whole group riches beyond their otherwise petty means.
We need bigwits, it is true, but we have plenty of our own that don’t come with such incompatible baggage and risk. Until every one of our gifted Americans is maximally employed in a career or social service that utilizes the full extent of their brilliance, we should not seek anyone outside of our borders to fill fundamental roles in our society. From masons and farmhands to businessmen and doctors, all should be internally sourced until there is no other possibility left. And when we do find ourselves strained to do so in those cases of truly unique talent, we should reach out to those countries that produce peoples akin to our own from Europe and its colonies and not the alien peoples of the world.
For every American we employ like this, we avoid having to deal with cultural shock, integration woes, and a myriad of other completely avoidable headaches. Not just that, but we solve the eternal problems of unemployment, underemployment, and wage stagnation. And we can have these talented Americans easily, if only we don’t stack the deck against them at every turn.
And as for the strawberries, fuck the strawberries. Let them rot on their runners and be food for birds and worms if their growers cannot pivot away from the slave labor they never should have employed. A just punishment for their crime of aiding and abetting opportunistic invaders, if overly merciful for what justice demands for their treachery against our nation.
Screw having a green card stapled to every foreigner’s diploma – staple a career acceptance letter to every one of our children’s diplomas!
Endurance Argument
“But we can endure them! They need us!”
Whether it comes in the form of a bleeding heart exhortation for universal compassion, or as a vacant acceptance to all that has been previously said, the Endurance argument is the most pathetic of them all.
It really is like someone insisting he drop a scoop of shit into your ice cream. To your protest he has plenty of things to say: It’s only a little scoop of shit. Just a little fecal matter never killed anyone. Just close your eyes and lick around the filth if you are going to be prissy about it. But please, you simply must let me shit in your ice cream!
Huh? You still refuse? What’s wrong with you? Pah, you must just dislike the aesthetics of it, that’s why you disagree!
But everyone knows why no reasonable person would do something that so overwhelmingly, if not solely, disadvantages their interests. Why do something with a low chance of positive success, that comes with guaranteed major drawbacks with no significant upside, and worst of all is completely optional when there are perfectly fine, if not objectively superior, alternatives available to us?
The moral of the story is, there isn’t a good reason. Not for you and me, at least.
Can America endure Chinese gutter-oil, Columbian cartel members, Haitian goose-gobblers, Indian street-shitters, and every other colorful unpleasantry these racial aliens bring about? Sure we could. We could survive, after a dismal fashion. But why should we endure it in the first place?
What intractable, otherwise unobtainable good is there to racially foreign immigration that makes up for the civic disruption, the culture warring, the racial strife, the urban decay, the shattered social capital, and the rapes and murders and losses of our people?
To throw back what DLA demanded of me – Quantify it. Tell everyone how many foreign retards you’d take to equal the value of one American life. Because my position is you cannot trade for something of positive value with something of negative value. Even one of these moronic marauders is too high a price for maybe a middling-intellect among them, so no number of them will ever equal one of my countrymen.
You might as well ask me how many scoops of shit does it take for me to trade you my ice cream. Choosing to not take the deal at all will deliver more value than accepting any terms!
Let me be the first to give a grim example of this metric we accept every day: Cars. Every day, we sacrifice around 100 souls to continue using vehicles in America. While not directly voluntary, we know down to a certainty how many lives vehicle usage takes. For every 100 million miles driven, we sacrifice 1.26 lives on average – that is how lacking in uncertainty we are about the cost of driving. When we as a society choose to allow driving, we are choosing that people will die.
Now, is driving worth that cost? The fact is the way our logistical systems are structured today, were we to dispense with driving, hundreds of millions would die within months in the resulting cataclysm. Modern society is built around roads designed for cars. Our entire civic infrastructure depends on mass vehicular usage, and its value runs the gambit from personal pleasantries to individual freedoms to life-sustaining supplylines.
Having vehicles in society are worth the human lives they consume.
As grim a conclusion as that is, there is not a single reasonable person who could argue that the benefits of driving are not of such an astounding magnitude that the drawbacks of ripping ourselves free of it would be worth it. Those hundred people a day who die because of vehicular misuse and failures are an inevitable side-effect of the technology, and will persist with us for as long as vehicular usage remains.
We don’t need to get into the details about mitigation techniques and the many other methods we as a society have utilized to reduce these risks and costs over time, as it is still the grim fact about that technology that car usage will inevitably kill people. No getting around it. And vehicle usage is as necessary to modern American society as breathing air or drinking water is to keep ourselves alive. The advantages in lives enabled and uplifted by car usage make up for its grim costs by most social metrics.
Now, how vital are racial aliens to our civilization? For they cost us a great deal more than vehicles in terms of human lives. Be it through negligence leading to accidental deaths or outright intentional murdering, they cost many times more lives than cars. Their “contributions”, their “brilliance”, their “culture”, must be of so astounding a value as to make vehicles look like optional toys in comparison to what they must grant to our nation to bear so high a human toll!
By the way, their names were Jashanpreet Singh (top) and Harjinder Singh (bottom), both beneficiaries of gaming the American immigration system.
DLA’s vaunted bigwit might get slaughtered alongside several other of our countrymen by even a single member of his retard legion. How’s that big brain going to help anyone when it is smeared under the tires of some vacant-eyed opportunist who doesn’t even speak our language?
You and everyone else knows that facilitating this is not worth the lives of our countrymen, any of them. Not even remotely.
The absurdity is that the negatives of these legions of retards are so vast and multi-faceted that trying to argue any number of them should be endured to get their “best” is mind-boggling. Even having their best diminishes our civilization and theirs, let alone justifying bringing in enclaves of ungrateful, stupid barbarians who will devour our resources like locusts with nothing to give us in return but ashes.
Everyone here should already know about the poisoned M&M in the bowl analogy, but proposing bringing in legions of retards just to get one smartie turns the analogy on its head. DLA proposes that we reach into a bowl of cyanide capsules in hopes of blindly plucking out the one or two real M&M’s in there! Is risking certain destruction worth that oh so tasty little morsel?
Or perhaps, hear me out, we just… don’t reach into the bowl in the first place.
I know! I know, gosh, my tinest snack cravings will go unfulfilled for a few brief moments, but I just won’t reach in. But the truth is not even DLA would dare take that risk for himself if he was the one who had to eat the results. He’s not one of his legion of retards, after all. But he will advocate that you eat the likely-cyanide so he can argue how morally righteous and intelligent he is for being such a good and compassionate Universalist.
The fact is, there isn’t a good reason to accept any of these incompatible racial types into our country for anything other than a temporary visit for the purposes of cultural exchange or tourism. DLA knows it, which is why he dances around even the statistics and fundamental logic of the proposition. All he can argue is the strawman that anyone who opposes immigration is simply prejudiced against “aesthetics” – as if the only difference between an American and a Haitian is skin pigmentation and opportunity.
Oh there’s more than just “aesthetics” going on with all this…
Yep, all one race – the human race. No hilariously obvious differences detected in this Leftist pageant here!
But that raises the question: If this policy is so manifestly and obviously damaging, then why is it being done? Because it might not be to you or my benefit, but someone benefits. In fact, a great many someones who thrive on discord, depressed wages, and social decay desperately want multiculturalism as a matter of life and death for their fortunes and power.
A now infamous leaked document between Amazon and Whole Foods revealed that the companies actively monitored locations for “unionization risk” based on racial diversity. Turns out the more racially diversified a place is, the less risk there was of unionization. How could this be? Quite simply because unionization requires complex trust and social networks based on a common cultural and psychological makeup – networks that are profoundly inhibited by dividing the population up between naturally antagonistic and otherwise mutually incompatible peoples.
Diversity is Our Strength is a corporate slogan, because it is their strength – the strength to crush unions and societal trust formation that could lead to unwanted competition. You can take that to the bank too, because Amazon and corporate giants across the West certainly do. And on their crooked scales they weigh petty profits against the long-term wellbeing of a nation and find money their master.
But even assuming these foreign nations are not just dumping their prisons and ghettos down our country’s gullet, they come to suffer in a different way when we continue acting like the great brain-drain of the world. Those desperate, poor, needy countries of the world are absolutely starved for talent. A country like Somalia with an average IQ of around 70 would produce less than 20k 130 IQ individuals, if even that. If those people are oh so important for bettering a country, then doesn’t Somalia of all places need as many of them as they can hold!?
Those who actually care for the wellbeing of other peoples whatsoever will not go out of their way to steal away the only talent they might have. We can endure not having their alien “genius” among us, but can they endure not having their own? No, clearly not.
Behold the Gumballs demonstration! 12 minutes of paradigm-shifting revelation for any of you still clinging to the selfish notion that we can “save the 3rd world” by plopping them into our midst:
So let me raise the counter then: Why endure any of them? Lets say we pull a Willy Wonka and shut our gates completely to all non-White immigration. We can keep guest visas and logistic exchanges open, but close down the residencies, work permits, remittances, and naturalization. What would happen?
The immediate shock to the system would be unpleasant for those who have relied on foreign slave labor and chain migrations. Corporate farms, sweatshops, contractors, Indian tech scammers, and a few more industries would probably writhe in agony at suddenly having to pay fair wages for their labor.
We would have to source all of our genius and labor from our burgeoning population, a task which would unfortunately employ many of our unemployed and give them a living wage. I know, how terrible! And worst of all, those street tacos of questionable health code compliance might have to give way to… American-made street tacos. Oh the humanity!
I dare say that there is no benefit that racially-foreign immigration can bring that cannot, and should not, be provided by our own people and by respectful cultural exchange and trade.
The only ones who might contend with that bold claim are East Asians like the Japanese, but even they don’t need to live here for us to benefit from a mutual respect and friendship as peoples. Cultural exchange, international trade, and foreign friendships are something I would encourage to keep fresh ideas and treasures flowing. I am no isolationist.
But we ought to do so with a respectful and firm distance. We must appreciate well-behaved guests and treat them to the full extent of our hospitality. But after our apportioned time together, they have to go home like any respectful guest. If we find them trying to take up residency in our pantry like rats, the only responsible thing to do is call in pest control before we lose our home to them.
By satisfying those needs by our own people and territories, we ensure more of our own get to contribute meaningfully to the lives and ambitions of our people. The pride and belonging every man, woman, and child can experience contributing to the innovations, culture, and advancements squarely due to our living traditions and racial character would be as a Renaissance for our Western spirit.
There was a famous exchange between John F. Kennedy and a NASA janitor during the space race. Kennedy asked the man what he did for NASA. Leaning on his broom and smiling, the janitor replied, “Why sir, I am helping to put a man on the Moon!” When virtually all men in a nation can answer as confidently and earnestly as that janitor did, because he feels a true union with his fellows regardless of their stations and his, that is when a nation truly experiences prosperity.
And what we stand to gain from such policies would wholly befit us as a people. The primary beneficiaries would not be the few fondling their stock portfolios or the market manipulators feasting on human misery, but the good and decent people who form the backbone of this country. Because all that we stand to gain will be borne out of our own National mind and not imposed on us or interrupted by alien minds trying to produce their own destiny within ours.
Conclusion
That concludes our brief tour of common arguments for racial replacement immigration practices. I don’t know which ones DLA most adheres to, or if he takes some other tact in his piece, but certainly the flimsy logic and willful ignorance about these ones animates the whole thrust of whatever his iteration would be. They tend to all arise from the same foolish root, after all.
Great innovators come overwhelmingly from Europe, not from the 3rd world. The overwhelming leeching of most non-Whites in Western civilizations negates whatever contributions their masses or elites might bring to the table. Our need for foreign labor is a symptom of over-dependence on it, causing more loss of opportunity than it brings in. And proclaiming that we can endure all these negatives falls flat when the benefits are so minuscule and fraught with civilization-destroying drawbacks.
The conclusion one will be led to by reason and data is simple: Don’t. Don’t do it. It is a far better bet to close the gates to racial strangers than it is to usher their unwashed masses in on the thin and foolish hope that some minuscule number of them will be “worth it” – whatever that vague notion even means.
World history backs up this simple conclusion. As immigration is a wholly optional act, there is no excuse for instituting it in the worst possible ways. For most of American history up until 1965, immigration was carefully restricted based on high merit and qualified fundamentally by “White men (and women) of good character”. That was not a mere “aesthetic” choice to limit immigrants to our close racial cousins, but a deeply practical decision that all wise peoples adopt throughout time and place.
The only ones who did not are the sorts who threw Chinese peasants onto the railroad lines and stuffed their kosher ships to the gills with Negroes to maximize their profits. Then, as now, these kinds of selfish and often outright evil practices cost mass bloodshed to end, and even after the consequences of those actions continue to plague the descendants of this country today.
Racial harmony is a highly valuable yet fragile social state, but thankfully occurs naturally when a biologically homogeneous people of shared ancestry, history, and culture get to live in their own territory among their own and whose international neighbors are of a highly similar racial type. No disparity, no discord.
While some alien peoples get along very well in our civilization, like the Japanese, this is a rare partial-exception to what amounts to an ironclad rule of human nature. You will never achieve racial harmony when you set alien races together to struggle over the same limited resources, the same power structures, and the same one-size-fits-none culture. Conflict becomes inevitable and ugly.
Even if DLA comes up with quantified numbers showing some isolated and temporary economic benefits or exhorts some feverish overemphasis on some spotlit exception to the overwhelming rule, the bringing-in of legions of retards is never justified when it is absolutely, incontrovertibly optional. Nothing in the nature of rulesets or practicalities or serious morality says that you need to bring in everyone if you want just certain someones – that is juvenile thinking akin to kindergartners grudgingly inviting the booger-eater to their birthday party just because they have to invite everyone.
My belief is that any morality that demands you intentionally blind yourself to aspects of reality as a matter of moral necessity is an inherently flawed and evil morality. The fruits of such a corrupt moral system will inevitably lead to ruin, and it must be rejected by a fearless investigation of truth and tradition.
Therefore, I conclude by encouraging DLA to abandon his suicidal sentiments about immigration and rejoin the reasonable and responsible in affirming that admitting a handful of rare racially alien bigwits is not worth hordes of their absolutely retarded brethren pouring in alongside them.
Good article. It could use more on just how few smart people there are from these countries.
"A country like Somalia with an average IQ of around 70 would produce less than 20k 130 IQ individuals, if even that."
The fraction above an IQ is:
=1 - NORMDIST(IQ; MEAN_IQ; SD)
with the US white mean = 100, s.d = 15, and typically a bit lower s.d. in smaller populations, say 14.
For a 70 IQ country with an s.d. of 14, less than 0.02% (1 in 5650) will have an IQ of 120, less than 0.2% (1 / 500th) of the rate for US whites. (Somalia is probably a bit below 70, 68 would give 1/900 of US White, Nigeria is sbout 70). At 130 / 70, the fraction falls to 9 in 1M. At 130 / 68, 4.7 per million. The population of Somalia is about 20M, so
there are fewer than 100 Somalis with a 130+ IQ.
There are fewer than 43,000 (of 240M) Nigerians with over 120IQ.
Of about 200M US Whites,
there are about 4.5M 130+ IQ,
18M 120+ IQ
Great essay, I admire your ability to pull all of it together to form one cohesive argument. It reminds me of Those Who Can See” with a little more fun prose.
I don’t like how modernity is obsessed with the ‘quantifiable’ as the only basis for decision making. Quality can guide decisions too, and used to guide decisions of societies. That’s how societies were differentiated, by the qualities they valued.